Classics and Feminism: thoughts on Virgil's Dido

Reblogged from A life unexamined:

Click to visit the original post

This semester at uni, I fell in love with Virgil. I can't profess knowledge of the entire Aeneid, but after thirteen weeks pouring over the Latin text of Book IV, weeping with Dido in her empty halls, cursing Aeneas with every bit of invective my mind could think up, and feeling my soul being lifted into the winds alongside the Carthaginian queen's, I can at least say that a part of the book has been permanently etched into my memory.

Read more… 1,214 more words

A really lovely, thought provoking post by my close friend, Jo.

About Futurus Essay

Julian Barr is a PhD student of Classics at the University of Queensland. His research interests are wide, but generally revolve around the Roman Empire and its literature. His research interests include but are not limited to: Second Sophistic literature, ancient conceptualisations of human reproduction, and early Christianity. He is in the early stages of a research project concerning the portrayal of unborn babies by the Roman African author, Tertullian. He also teaches part-time, and serves as an occasional museum minion. He also happens to be a father of two rambunctious toddlers, and is husband to an extraordinary woman.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Classics and Feminism: thoughts on Virgil's Dido

  1. Jo says:

    I’m glad you enjoyed the post. <3

  2. No worries! My theory about Dido being nude is that it’s a common feature of Romano-Celtic art to depict women that way. Not always, but often. There’s usually a heavy emphasis on fertility too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s